Tuesday, September 30, 2008
Journal 5
Journal 5
Perhaps my mission statement will change as my paper progresses. As of now, the paper is complete crap and the mission statement follows suit.
music and art
Journal 5
journal 5
Journal 5
Emotional Visuals
Monday, September 29, 2008
journal 5
Sunday, September 28, 2008
Journal 5
Journal 5
Here's an example:
- I want to examine the relationship between the cover photo on this month's Cosmo and the headlines that appear on the cover.
- I want to show the reader how the meaning of the cover is fundamentally changed by the visual/text interaction.
- I want to question the difference between the headlines and the implications of the photo- there seems to be a conflicting message. Are women being objectified or empowered?
- I want to make sure to include several examples from the magazine.
- I want to offer an insightful analysis that goes beyond observation.
- I will include an image of the cover.
- I will follow MLA guidelines.
Thursday, September 25, 2008
Wednesday, September 24, 2008
Tuesday, September 23, 2008
Journal 4

Monday, September 15, 2008
journal-3 Brandon
Journal 3
Journal 3
Journal 3
Wow. I would say it is rather humorous, and Moore is really trying to get us to enter her crazy mind. I think her main goal here is the sarcasm of playing along with certain stereotypes of writers in general and how it really is kind of boring to deal with the common questions.
I am naturally a pretty goofy person and I enjoy making people laugh. Most people would probably say that I am immature and maybe a little childish, but to argue that I can say that well maybe life is too serious in general and someone has to make it interesting. Sometimes I feel that my life also has no plot, there is no great conflict or a rise and fall of a hero, there is no real point or lesson that can be taken from my life. I do think however, and just like Moore’s passages, that this isn’t really a bad thing at all. Ultimately my life is a story and there are parts that will make you laugh and parts that will make you cry, however I think that most would say, “Ok what was the point to this?” my reply would be “Yea but I made you laugh”. For that x amount of time I stole that person’s emotion and controlled it the way I wanted to and the entertainment of the story is the most important part.
Speaking towards the whole five-paragraph essay is a touchy subject for me. My whole life has been based on the quality of a five-paragraph essay. A very awkward and strict way to present thoughts and really took all the personality out of everything I wrote so naturally I was terrible at it. I have read a lot of essays and the only ones I like are a lot like the ones we have been reading. Kooky and humorous little personal essays that make me say, ”Oh hey, that’s exactly how I feel” They are often quite lax and follow no real written template like the five paragraph set up.
Journal 3
Moore’s article “How to Become a Writer” makes you laugh as you read about Francie’s attempt at becoming a writer. Although some might view Moore as an “insane writer” I beg to differ. I don’t find her style to be insane in anyway. The flow of her writing is much like a stream of consciousness, and she seems to write every thought that comes to mind even if that means a short brief statement. It allows me to look into her mine and get a grasp of where she is coming from. I personally like the style Moore uses.
I don’t feel that there is anything wrong with writing in a five paragraph format; however I do feel it is a little drawn out. We have all been told to simple format of a five paragraph paper, and I choose not to use it. I write what I feel needs to be written, and I think following a format buts a limit on the ability of a person to write will all the creative juices they have. Write as the thoughts come, not as the format goes.
Sunday, September 14, 2008
Crazy?
journal 3
"Highly opinionated" and "insane" have a fine line between them in my opinion, so considering that a lot of writers have very unique opinions, it's easy to see why people categorize them as crazy people, writers have to take this critisism because they are "going against the grain" with their writings and are easily misinterpreted by the mainstream brain-washed population. The stereotypes that i handed out in high-school included "clueless" and "over-simplified" characters of people that i considered to have missed out on the big picture and had essentially taken their constraints of the definition of self right off the television set. I think that plot is certainly needed in arguementative essays and reviews or any other informative paper or essay. Plot is the sense of direction or purpose for an essay and helps the reader and the writer to stay on topic much easier. This is why i think plot is not always needed in creative writing. When the intentions of a paper are undefined or when the paper has no purpose it has no need for a plot, the plot or purpose of the story is solely created by the reader and is different to every individual. An example being the film Napolean Dynamite, in which napolean is "out to prove he has nothing to prove" the movie has basically no plot to it at all yet was still a popular flick because it could mean anything to viewers. So in writing I think a paper without a plot can still be interesting or entertaining,but it can have no pre-set purpose or cause. So in other words, if you have anything specific to say or prove you definately need a plot. I think the five-paragraph style that i am all to familiar with does restrict creative thinking, how much can you really say with that perimeter on elaboration? Not much, i think that style tends to instruct writers to make bland conclusions and avoid more complex ones. It is a great style for simple topics and short writing prompts but leaves too much unwritten in most cases. It also creates verbose essays when a writer has perhaps only one strong arguement and really only needs three paragraphs to show his or her point of view. I am familiar with this style of writing but I never really took a liking to it.
Journal 3
Journal 3
Journal 3
Journal Three
Journal 3
Journal 3
Friday, September 12, 2008
Journal 3
Thursday, September 11, 2008
JOURNAL 3
Wednesday, September 10, 2008
Journal 3
Journal 3

Read and respond to Lorrie Moore’s “How to Become a Writer.” Is Moore’s article humorous or serious? Is the idea of an “insane writer” a cliché? Is her article a common misconception of writers? What are some common stereotypes you have or that people have about you? Moore continually repeats that her character has “no sense of plot.” What is a plot and do you need it? Also, is a five-paragraph essay problematic? Are you used to writing papers in a five-paragraph format? Think of essays that you like and why you find them memorable and not.
Wednesday, September 3, 2008
Journal 2
Journal 2
Journal 2
Journal 2

Journal 2
Tuesday, September 2, 2008
Journal 2
While reading through “MTV Mike” I kept catching myself nodding my head, and thinking, “yes, yes, that’s so true.” Even if his sophisticated and deep yet casual and personable writing style wasn’t so convincing and easy to agree with, Mike has intelligently and successfully forced me to see MTV from a perspective very rarely looked at. For Mike, MTV has inspired his desire to question and challenge ‘what’s acceptable’ and also had played a part in forming who he is today. “MTV Mike” takes a show that Mike is almost ashamed to have watched as a child, Beavis and Butthead, and explains how that influence from Butthead’s individuality had made an impact of who he is today, (in a good way!). Reversely, the ‘cruelty and superficiality’ of shows like ‘Next’ and ‘Parental Control’ have taught him how not to act. After reading “MTV Mike”, I feel like I can completely relate to Mike and I’m sure that 99% of the people around me can say the same thing.
Hello. My name is Brittany, and I am part of the MTV generation.
Journal 2

Journal 2
Journal 2
As for Mike's writing style, it was excellent. His grammar and word choice were two things that really stood out to me. I believe this paper was written to be read more by the students than the faculty/ adults. His writing style reflects that of a teenager and is really easy to connect to for me. His essay as a whole was a funny, easy read that was easily understood. No big, confusing words. Just pure though and passion about his topic. There was no fluff in sight. So his overall message was off basis in my opinion, but at least it was easy to understand.
Journal 2
Mike's writing style is very unique because it is not how anyone is taught to write. My english teachers always told me, "You can only write incorrectly is you're a famous author." because somehow that is acceptable. He uses a more intellectual tone than you may expect in an article about pretty stupid things. Almost as if he was writing about these influences of MTV for a magazine article; on the cover "How is MTV affecting kids today?" His language is intelligent, yet he still relates to the common person and teenager.
Monday, September 1, 2008
MTV Mike

MTV Mike
